Do we select the one that inherently appeals to us, that makes most sense and has the greatest explanatory power or, like Fred Pine (1990), do we seek to evolve a unifying perspective among various models of the mind?Īt the 2013 Convention of the Society for Personality Assessment ( Kleiger et al., 2013) and again at the 2014 International Congress of Rorschach and Projective Methods ( Kleiger et al., 2014), distinguished panels of senior psychologists furthered this debate by presenting their interpretations of a single Rorschach protocol from multiple psychoanalytic theoretical lenses. However, we are often faced with the question of which guiding theory to use. Since Schafer spoke these words, the importance of integrating psychological theories of development and psychopathology into test interpretation has been recognized as a well-established axiom of diagnostic testing. This guiding thought is psychological theory, whether explicit and systemized or implicit and unsystematized. What it accomplishes depends upon the thinking that guides its application. No matter how helpful a clinical tool may be, a psychological test cannot do its own thinking.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |